Saturday, July 31, 2010

Newt Gingrich Praises Anti-Defamation League for Opposing Proposed Islamic Community Center near Ground Zero

Newt Gingrich Praises Anti-Defamation League for Opposing Proposed Islamic Community Center near Ground Zero

July 30, 2010 5pm



Further to A Taste of American Debate and Discussion may I remind you the followings:

1. Osama bin Laden! Guilty or Innocent?

2. (Who Invented) Osama bin Laden to Slaughter the Arabs and Muslims?

3. USA Must Quit Afghanistan Now

4. Iraq: A War For Israel

5. Cheney: Iraq pullout would hurt Israel | JTA - Jewish & Israel News

6. Illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq

7. Why “DEAD IN THE WATER” is an anti-Semitic Documentary?

Furthermore:

A. Europol Report: All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 99.6% that Aren't

B. All Terrorists are Muslims…Except the 94% that Aren't

C. RAND report: Threat of homegrown jihadism exaggerated, Zero U.S. civilians killed since 9/11

D. The Gujarat Train Fire was an accident and NOT Islamic Terrorism?

E. Do You Know a Muslim Terrorist Might be Under Your Bed?

Clearly demonstrate the fact that Muslims are victims in the game!

Most importantly, the Muslims did not conspire to kill Jesus. In fact the Jews did it. Surprisingly, for that offence, they are rewarded with Judeo-Christian culture! One must wonder what offence the Muslims should commit to gain a status like the Judeo-Christian Culture and avoid the wrath of the so called the Judeo-Christian mobs?

Sunday, July 11, 2010

Who wants to see Gillard as pro-Israel and anti-Islam?

Who wants to see Gillard as pro-Israel and anti-Islam?

Who wants to see Gillard as pro-Israel and anti-Islam?

The ALP and Israel is like a disease that no medicine can cure

Published on 5 July 2010 in Israel. 1 Comment

Print This Post

Australian unionist Paul Howes loves Israel. He supports its criminality, murder of opponents, defends it from everybody and would ideally like to make love to the Jewish state. He's also one of the key figures behind the recent coup of Julia Gillard when overthrowing Kevin Rudd.

Welcome to the modern Australian Labor Party, where Israel is a state religion.

His column in yesterday's Sunday Telegraph is a typical rant that conveniently forgets to mention that one of Australia's leading Zionist lobbyists, Albert Dadon, is actually an Israeli lobbyist. He wields influence but of course we can't mention this. Furthermore, Howes doesn't want to see that there is a profound conflict of influence with the Prime Minister's partner working for a Zionist lobbyist who is trying to affect government policy towards the Middle East. But of course for some, anything related to the Jewish state is beyond criticism. Fat chance:

It hasn't taken long for the double standards to emerge, in the week since our first female Prime Minister took office.

While it's significant that Julia Gillard is our first female PM, what's really significant is how long it took us to get there.

I'm writing this column in the Sydney CBD, where we have a female Lord Mayor and State member, and female federal MP, a female Premier and a female Governor.

In Canberra, there's a female Governor General and – at last – a female PM. With the exception of the dual-Lord Mayor/Member for Bligh, all these women are, or were appointed by, Labor.

The Liberal Party, on the other hand, is so bereft of female talent that they've recycled Julie Bishop as deputy leader three times for different leaders, despite the fact that she's not considered competent enough to hold the shadow Treasury portfolio.

But the progressive side of politics has always championed women. In my own role as a union official, we have had female leaders of the Australian Council of Trade Unions since 1996, with the newest president, Ged Kearney, taking office in the past week.

She replaces Sharan Burrow, who has been elected as the head of the global trade union movement.

Yet we've already seen double standards being applied to our new PM with significant media coverage of Prime Minister Gillard's hair, clothes, voice and domestic arrangements.

The Melbourne Age carried a front-page story last week about the employment status of the Prime Minister's partner, Tim Mathieson.

He works as a salesman for a Melbourne property company, chaired by Albert Dadon, prominent in the local Jewish community.

The article implied that, somehow, because Mr Mathieson works for a company associated with a Jewish community member, this would somehow impact on the PM's stance on foreign policy, particularly in relation to her views on Israel.

It was one of the crassest examples of shoddy journalism I've seen. The implication was, firstly, that because Mr Mathieson is a man and the PM a woman, whatever he thinks about the world or who he works for will impact on what Ms Gillard thinks.

The second implication was that, simply because Mr Mathieson works for a company owned by a prominent Jew, his personal views on policy matters will be skewed by his job.

One Canberra press gallery journalist summed it up best on Twitter when he said: "I can't ever recall a male politician being the subject of claims his wife's job would influence his views on the Middle East."

He was spot on, summing up in one sentence the appalling double standards applied to Prime Minister Gillard in the article. In fact, outrage over the article was so intense that even former Age editor Michael Gawenda labelled it "bizarre".

Mr Mathieson's employer, apart from being Jewish, is a well-known jazz musician and was chairman of the Melbourne Jazz Festival.

Following the logic of The Age's article, one could presume that our nation's leader will redirect the Government's arts funding solely towards the Australian jazz industry.

Ludicrous, isn't it? Just as ludicrous as saying that the PM is going to toe some pro-Israel line simply because of who her partner works for. It's the type of double standards and sexist reporting that belongs in the past.

Julia Gillard has shown she is her own person. It doesn't matter what her hair looks like. I don't think anyone is really interested in how she dresses. It doesn't matter who her partner works for or what their living arrangements are.

What matters is that she's the best person for the job and light years ahead of Tony Abbott when it comes to understanding the needs of ordinary Australians. Yes, she's different from her predecessors, but just like Kevin Rudd, John Howard, Paul Keating and Bob Hawke, she is her own person.

Any suggestion that her partner's views, or her hairstyle, has any bearing on how she runs the country is laughable at best, sexist at worst.

Paul Howes is national secretary of the Australian Workers' Union

Who wants to see Gillard as pro-Israel and anti-Islam? (Pictorial)


Who wants to see Gillard as pro-Israel and anti-Islam?

Who wants to see Gillard as pro-Israel and anti-Islam?

Who wants to see Gillard as pro-Israel and anti-Islam?

The ALP and Israel is like a disease that no medicine can cure

Published on 5 July 2010 in Israel. 1 Comment

Print This Post

Australian unionist Paul Howes loves Israel. He supports its criminality, murder of opponents, defends it from everybody and would ideally like to make love to the Jewish state. He's also one of the key figures behind the recent coup of Julia Gillard when overthrowing Kevin Rudd.

Welcome to the modern Australian Labor Party, where Israel is a state religion.

His column in yesterday's Sunday Telegraph is a typical rant that conveniently forgets to mention that one of Australia's leading Zionist lobbyists, Albert Dadon, is actually an Israeli lobbyist. He wields influence but of course we can't mention this. Furthermore, Howes doesn't want to see that there is a profound conflict of influence with the Prime Minister's partner working for a Zionist lobbyist who is trying to affect government policy towards the Middle East. But of course for some, anything related to the Jewish state is beyond criticism. Fat chance:

It hasn't taken long for the double standards to emerge, in the week since our first female Prime Minister took office.

While it's significant that Julia Gillard is our first female PM, what's really significant is how long it took us to get there.

I'm writing this column in the Sydney CBD, where we have a female Lord Mayor and State member, and female federal MP, a female Premier and a female Governor.

In Canberra, there's a female Governor General and – at last – a female PM. With the exception of the dual-Lord Mayor/Member for Bligh, all these women are, or were appointed by, Labor.

The Liberal Party, on the other hand, is so bereft of female talent that they've recycled Julie Bishop as deputy leader three times for different leaders, despite the fact that she's not considered competent enough to hold the shadow Treasury portfolio.

But the progressive side of politics has always championed women. In my own role as a union official, we have had female leaders of the Australian Council of Trade Unions since 1996, with the newest president, Ged Kearney, taking office in the past week.

She replaces Sharan Burrow, who has been elected as the head of the global trade union movement.

Yet we've already seen double standards being applied to our new PM with significant media coverage of Prime Minister Gillard's hair, clothes, voice and domestic arrangements.

The Melbourne Age carried a front-page story last week about the employment status of the Prime Minister's partner, Tim Mathieson.

He works as a salesman for a Melbourne property company, chaired by Albert Dadon, prominent in the local Jewish community.

The article implied that, somehow, because Mr Mathieson works for a company associated with a Jewish community member, this would somehow impact on the PM's stance on foreign policy, particularly in relation to her views on Israel.

It was one of the crassest examples of shoddy journalism I've seen. The implication was, firstly, that because Mr Mathieson is a man and the PM a woman, whatever he thinks about the world or who he works for will impact on what Ms Gillard thinks.

The second implication was that, simply because Mr Mathieson works for a company owned by a prominent Jew, his personal views on policy matters will be skewed by his job.

One Canberra press gallery journalist summed it up best on Twitter when he said: "I can't ever recall a male politician being the subject of claims his wife's job would influence his views on the Middle East."

He was spot on, summing up in one sentence the appalling double standards applied to Prime Minister Gillard in the article. In fact, outrage over the article was so intense that even former Age editor Michael Gawenda labelled it "bizarre".

Mr Mathieson's employer, apart from being Jewish, is a well-known jazz musician and was chairman of the Melbourne Jazz Festival.

Following the logic of The Age's article, one could presume that our nation's leader will redirect the Government's arts funding solely towards the Australian jazz industry.

Ludicrous, isn't it? Just as ludicrous as saying that the PM is going to toe some pro-Israel line simply because of who her partner works for. It's the type of double standards and sexist reporting that belongs in the past.

Julia Gillard has shown she is her own person. It doesn't matter what her hair looks like. I don't think anyone is really interested in how she dresses. It doesn't matter who her partner works for or what their living arrangements are.

What matters is that she's the best person for the job and light years ahead of Tony Abbott when it comes to understanding the needs of ordinary Australians. Yes, she's different from her predecessors, but just like Kevin Rudd, John Howard, Paul Keating and Bob Hawke, she is her own person.

Any suggestion that her partner's views, or her hairstyle, has any bearing on how she runs the country is laughable at best, sexist at worst.

Paul Howes is national secretary of the Australian Workers' Union

Who wants to see Gillard as pro-Israel and anti-Islam?


Friday, July 9, 2010

Israel Does Not Have Any Peace Plan, Even Today!

Israel Does Not Have Any Peace Plan, Even Today!



Stop the crap and the facts are:

1. Cheney: Iraq pullout would hurt Israel.

2. Iraq: A War For Israel.

3. Israel does not have a peace plan.

4. Americans must fight and die for Israel.


Arab


Benjamin Netanyahu seeks peace 'miracle'

  • From: AFP
  • July 09, 2010 12:00AM


BUOYED by an upbeat meeting at the White House, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu said "miracles" were possible if all sides came together for a peace deal.

He pledged to address the thorny issue of settlements as a priority in any talks with the Palestinians.

Heading to New York for talks with UN chief Ban Ki-moon, Mr Netanyahu told ABC television he wanted to reach an agreement acceptable to Israelis with the Palestinian Authority President, Mahmoud Abbas.

"We want President Abbas to grasp my hand, get into a room, shake it, sit down and negotiate a final settlement of peace between Israel and the Palestinians," he said. He added he was confident that a Middle East peace deal, which has eluded Israeli, Palestinian and US leaders for decades, could be struck.

"Don't be so sceptical," Mr Netanyahu said. "Raise your hopes. It's summer time and we can perform miracles if we set our sights to them."

Later in an interview on CNN, he accepted Larry King's proposal to talk to Mr Abbas in a three-way television hook-up with Jordan's King Abdullah if the other parties agreed.

He also declared that the future of Israeli settlements in the West Bank would be among the first issues to be negotiated if the Palestinians resumed direct peace talks. "One of the things we'll discuss right away is settlements, and that's what I propose doing," he said.

Mr Netanyahu's coalition government leans heavily on hawks, bitterly opposed to any limits on settlement in the West Bank, on land which the Palestinians claim for a future state.

The UN chief was not expected to be quite as warm as President Barack Obama. Mr Ban said before the meeting that while Israel's easing of its four-year blockade of the Gaza Strip was welcome, more needed to be done to ease Palestinian hardships.

"Further steps must now follow to meet those needs and to allow the United Nations to accelerate and expand its efforts," his spokesman said.

The secretary-general has demanded Israel lift its blockade of the impoverished Gaza Strip, imposed in the wake of the election victory by Hamas militants, who now control the Palestinian territory.

Israel has so far given the go-ahead for the international community to import construction materials into Gaza. And Mr Netanyahu said yesterday further steps were under consideration.

"There are more things we are prepared to do . . . There are things like additional easing of movements, some questions of economic projects," he told ABC.

The change in policy was triggered by the international condemnation of an Israeli commando raid on an aid flotilla trying to break the blockade that led to the deaths of nine Turkish activists on May 31.

Israel has set up a commission of inquiry into the events with the participation of British and Canadian observers, but some nations are calling on the UN for a fuller international probe.

After the White House meeting on Tuesday, local time, Mr Obama said he hoped for direct peace talks to start before the end of September, when an Israeli freeze on settlement building is due to expire.

"I believe that Prime Minister Netanyahu wants peace. I think he's willing to take risks for peace," Mr Obama told reporters.

The call was even echoed by the very hawkish Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman.

"My feeling is that we can move very fast with direct talks, about September this year, we can move from proximity talks to the direct talks," Mr Lieberman told reporters in Vilnius, Lithuania.

Mr Abbas responded coolly to the Washington summit, saying he would like more progress on issues including borders and security before any direct negotiations.

Before leaving Washington, Mr Netanyahu met Defence Secretary Robert Gates. Officials said Mr Netanyahu told Mr Gates that in direct peace talks with the Palestinians, Israel would want assurances a Palestinian state would not be able to smuggle in heavy weaponry such as rockets.

He also expressed the fear that once US troops left Iraq, Israel could again face threats from the east for the first time in a decade.

Saddam Hussein fired several Scud missiles into Israel during the first Gulf war, but the comment was also seen as a reference to Israel's wish to remain in the Jordan Valley as part of a final peace deal, with the Israeli military acting as a buffer between the eastern flank of a Palestinian state and Jordan.

Mr Netanyahu had also raised the possibility of Israel buying unspecified "defence products" from the US.

AFP